Over the past couple of years I have seriously evaluated the relationships in my life and wondered about how healthy they were for me and what impacts they may have. I’ve ended friendships and romantic relationships and I have even talked with my parents about the relationship that we have with each other, so looking at the relationship I have with technology seems to be within that theme. I don’t think my relationship with technology is technically the most healthy thing but neither is the relationship I sustain with reading books, I find a book, I obsess over it, and once it is over I have to find another book or I end up entering a small depressive phase. I know that social media can influence someone’s mental health in disastrous ways if allowed and I know that sometimes social media and technology just aren’t the cause of it. In my senior year of high school I had to do the senior exit project, there was a 6 to 8 page paper written in junior year and then finally a presentation at some point during your senior year, you could pick any topic of interest and I decided to write and present about mental illnesses. I learned a significant amount about how social media influences the brain and while there is some influence technology isn’t the only thing that affects mental health. While the things you learn on the internet are not all true there are good things too, like being able to connect to family and friends from extreme distances, which is especially nice during times like we are facing currently. I have a significant number of worries regarding the information available on the internet but I always remind myself the technology has bettered our lives. I do believe there is a certain amount we should allow to affect our lives.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/digital-world-real-world/202002/anxiety-and-social-media-use
Com1450
Sunday, May 3, 2020
Monday, April 27, 2020
Five Eyes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UKUSA_Agreement
Five Eyes: “The United Kingdom – United States of America Agreement (UKUSA, is a multilateral agreement for cooperation in signals intelligence between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Emerging from an informal agreement related to the 1941 Atlantic Charter, the secret treaty was renewed with the passage of the 1943 BRUSA Agreement, before being officially enacted on 5 March 1946 by the United Kingdom and the United States. In the following years, it was extended to encompass Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Other countries, known as "third parties", such as West Germany, the Philippines, and several Nordic countries, also joined the UKUSA community in associate capacities, although they are not part of mechanism for automatic sharing of intelligence that exists between the Five Eyes.”
The intelligence group could be a good thing as it allows multiple countries to share information with each other more easily but other countries who are not included within the group will be left in the dark and might feel ostracized.
Society might feel mistrustful of the government because for a while this group was kept secret and only select few knew about it. People already don’t trust the government to not invade their personal lives but to know that there was a secret organization dedicated to gathering information would cause a more significant amount of distrust.
My generation may become significantly more paranoid about the information that they share online or otherwise due to knowing that there can be secret organizations who are compiling information.
Five Eyes: “The United Kingdom – United States of America Agreement (UKUSA, is a multilateral agreement for cooperation in signals intelligence between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Emerging from an informal agreement related to the 1941 Atlantic Charter, the secret treaty was renewed with the passage of the 1943 BRUSA Agreement, before being officially enacted on 5 March 1946 by the United Kingdom and the United States. In the following years, it was extended to encompass Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Other countries, known as "third parties", such as West Germany, the Philippines, and several Nordic countries, also joined the UKUSA community in associate capacities, although they are not part of mechanism for automatic sharing of intelligence that exists between the Five Eyes.”
The intelligence group could be a good thing as it allows multiple countries to share information with each other more easily but other countries who are not included within the group will be left in the dark and might feel ostracized.
Society might feel mistrustful of the government because for a while this group was kept secret and only select few knew about it. People already don’t trust the government to not invade their personal lives but to know that there was a secret organization dedicated to gathering information would cause a more significant amount of distrust.
My generation may become significantly more paranoid about the information that they share online or otherwise due to knowing that there can be secret organizations who are compiling information.
Wednesday, April 22, 2020
Self Audit

Monday, March 30, 2020
Stable Change
3. Stable Change ( aka Safety Valve) — see Benedict Spinoza, Tractatus-Theologico Politicus
It has been suggested that a society in which angry and alienated citizens are allowed to speak their mind, or "vent," will be more stable, as people will be less likely to resort to violence. It has also been pointed out that allowing the alienated and discontented to speak freely enables the government to better monitor potentially dangerous groups who would otherwise act more clandestinely. Ultimately, it is in the government's own self-interest to allow such venting.
Of the eight values of free expression the one that I find the most value in is “Stable Change” as this suggests that venting allows for a society to prevent violence as a result of angry or alienated citizens. It is the most important because it allows for safe expression of these things that might make a person angry, violence in my opinion is something that can be easily prevented and it is my belief that everything should be done in order to prevent violence from occurring. I often tell my friends that any secret they tell me will be safe with me unless someone is going to harm another person or themselves. Though I can understand the reasons for acting out of anger or frustration but the actions of violence themselves are something I refuse to validate in order to reduce the amount that those around me resort to violence. Being safe is something that I put a lot of value in, I am a rather anxious person and coming up with scenarios which could be the result of risky behavior is something i am rather good at, so being safe is one of the things I care about because I know of all the potentially harmful things that could be a result of not being safe.
It has been suggested that a society in which angry and alienated citizens are allowed to speak their mind, or "vent," will be more stable, as people will be less likely to resort to violence. It has also been pointed out that allowing the alienated and discontented to speak freely enables the government to better monitor potentially dangerous groups who would otherwise act more clandestinely. Ultimately, it is in the government's own self-interest to allow such venting.
Of the eight values of free expression the one that I find the most value in is “Stable Change” as this suggests that venting allows for a society to prevent violence as a result of angry or alienated citizens. It is the most important because it allows for safe expression of these things that might make a person angry, violence in my opinion is something that can be easily prevented and it is my belief that everything should be done in order to prevent violence from occurring. I often tell my friends that any secret they tell me will be safe with me unless someone is going to harm another person or themselves. Though I can understand the reasons for acting out of anger or frustration but the actions of violence themselves are something I refuse to validate in order to reduce the amount that those around me resort to violence. Being safe is something that I put a lot of value in, I am a rather anxious person and coming up with scenarios which could be the result of risky behavior is something i am rather good at, so being safe is one of the things I care about because I know of all the potentially harmful things that could be a result of not being safe.
Thursday, March 5, 2020
Carrier Pigeons & World War Two

Thursday, February 27, 2020
Cassette Tapes

History of Cassette Tapes
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
Kentucky School Bans Fortnite

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)